Some people in the United States advocate that ethanol fuel can be a good alternative to gasoline fuel. Ethanol is made from some plants such as sugar cane and corn. The passage suggests some disadvantages of this fuel.
First, ethanol burning produces carbon dioxide which makes the earth warmer so it can not be a good replacement for gasoline. Although the professor says that as ethanol production increases, planting increases too and these plants can absorb carbon dioxide which comes from ethanol burning.
Second, plants are the most important food resource for animals such as cows and chickens. By using a large number of plants for ethanol production, a substantial resource of food for animals will diminish. On the other hand, the professor says that ethanol is made of cellulose and it can be extracted from some parts of plants which are not used by animals.
Third, in fact, ethanol price is much more than gasoline price and the government pay tax subsidies to make ethanol price similar to gasoline price. So ethanol can have the huge cost for the government and if the government does not pay subsidies, its price will grow hugely. Although the professor mentions that as the ethanol production increases, the facilities for ethanol will increase too. If ethanol production is three times more than present production, its price will decrease by 40 percent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...als such as cows and chickens. By using a large number of plants for ethanol production, a substa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, third, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1152.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 228.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05263157895 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55967557674 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513157894737 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.0 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6560356851 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.545980828208 0.272083759551 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.218248282329 0.0996497079465 219% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078039264569 0.0662205650399 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.330329049716 0.162205337803 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459896951065 0.0443174109184 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.