TPO 23 Integrated
The professor explains three clear arguments opposing the points stated in the reading about the reasons of yellow cedars' decline in populations.
First, the reading passage states that insect parasites could have been reason of yellow cedar decline whereas cedar bark beetle, especially the beetle larvae, has been known as major killer of this tree. Nevertheless, the professor brings up the idea of yellow cedar's resistance against insects by employing powerful chemical substances which are harmful to insects. Also, as she stated, it has been indicated that mostly damaged or sick trees are prone to danger of the bark beetle not healthy ones. Therefore, the professor repudiates this hypothesis.
Second, the professor opposes the idea presented in the reading passage about bears' role in yellow cedar decline. As she claimed, although bear may have negative effect to yellow cedars, their population and scope of damage are very limited. Therefore, bears impact on overall population decline is dubious. Furthermore, she states that many yellow cedars are exist in islands so that there is no bears to damage trees. However, yellow cedars population is decreasing in these ares either.
Third and last, the reading passage asserts that climate change may be the blame because temperature fluctuations in the last hundred years affected roots growing behavior. So, change in timing of root growth may have had severe results in trees health in the way that roots, which are so sensitive to freezing, may damage by cold temperature. On the contrary, the professor disproves the idea due to the fact that yellow cedars population in warmer latitudes are faster decreasing rather than colder elevations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cedars'' or 'cedar's'?
Suggestion: cedars'; cedar's
... professor brings up the idea of yellow cedars resistance against insects by employing...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
... she states that many yellow cedars are exist in islands so that there is no bears to...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 386, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are no bears'?
Suggestion: there are no bears
...low cedars are exist in islands so that there is no bears to damage trees. However, yellow cedars...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 437, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cedars'' or 'cedar's'?
Suggestion: cedars'; cedar's
... bears to damage trees. However, yellow cedars population is decreasing in these ares ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 423, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cedars'' or 'cedar's'?
Suggestion: cedars'; cedar's
...es the idea due to the fact that yellow cedars population in warmer latitudes are fast...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, whereas, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35555555556 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55159112789 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581481481481 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9195204072 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.230769231 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.440243439871 0.272083759551 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144166520138 0.0996497079465 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069300815839 0.0662205650399 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248559997373 0.162205337803 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0791129381782 0.0443174109184 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.