The main idea of both the reading and the lecture is reasons which caused declining of populations of yellow cedar. Considering this, the author states that several hypotheses describe this decline. The professor, on the other hand, clearly challenges whatever contended in the reading by citing three rational reasons which show reasons in reading are inadequate.
First, both the author and the professor talk about special insect, bark beetle, can destroyed yellow cedar. As claimed by the passage, this creature may decline yellow cedar thorough its larvae eat the wood. The lecturer, nevertheless, contradicts the author's view and explain healthy cedar trees are much resistant than other trees. This trees because of using of powerful chemical elements for eliminates insects were weak. As a result, weaken yellow cedars are not anymore resistant to seek.
Second of all, both the author and the professor discuss the effect of decreasing bears on the population of cedars. The passage goes on to mention that decline bears that eat the tree bark beetles may induce to dying cedars. In contrast, the lecturer explains that populations of the yellow cedar in some regions which have no bears had decreased.
The last point discussed in passage has to do with gradual changes of climate may be to influenced. cold weather causes root
was damaged. The professor rejects this by explaining the subject which although lower elevation is warm and higher elevation is cold, trees exist in lower elevation more died than higher elevation. These evidences suggest cedar's root are sensitive and cause kill them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 100, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Cold
...hanges of climate may be to influenced. cold weather causes root was damaged. The ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to influenced. cold weather causes root was damaged. The professor rejects this ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, may, nevertheless, second, so, as to, in contrast, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 258.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2519379845 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48905120053 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600775193798 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2663516054 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3333333333 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40993221762 0.272083759551 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129599236746 0.0996497079465 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586759583048 0.0662205650399 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199878170188 0.162205337803 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687350312138 0.0443174109184 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.