The main idea of both the passage and the lecturer is strange sound that soldiers hear in operation of patrolling was come from. Considering this, the author states that several theories about what might have caused the odd sounds. The professor, on the other hand, clearly challenges whatever contended in the reading by citing three logical reasons which shows uncertainty of assumption of reading.
First, both the author and the professor talk about weird sound come from male and female whales. As claimed by the passage, male and female whales when call each ether generate voices which were unusual. The lecturer explain that this theory is acceptable at first, but usually population of whales live in surface ocean. While, these noises heard in deep place of ocean. Another reason for rejecting this choice is whales detected easily by submarines' sonar.
Second of all, another theory that debated in both the passage and the lecturer is presence of giant squid. The passage goes on to maintain that giant squid are marine invertebrates that live deep in the ocean and difficult to recognize them by sonar. In contrast, the professor explains submarines report the sounds in 1960 and these sounds had continued until 1980. While, these creatures have lived until today.
The last point that the author and the lecturer discussed is create these noises by other military technology. The author asserts another country's submarines that secretly patrolling the area. However, the professor contradicts the author's view by explain that source of sounds change direction very quickly. While, engines can't produce noises which come from different directions. Also, there is no resemblance between sounds and engine’s noises.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 218, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'explains'.
Suggestion: explains
...voices which were unusual. The lecturer explain that this theory is acceptable at first...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 323, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lation of whales live in surface ocean. While, these noises heard in deep place of oc...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 443, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'submarines'' or 'submarine's'?
Suggestion: submarines'; submarine's
...his choice is whales detected easily by submarines sonar. Second of all, another theory t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... these sounds had continued until 1980. While, these creatures have lived until today...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 62, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'created'.
Suggestion: created
...he author and the lecturer discussed is create these noises by other military technolo...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 309, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...f sounds change direction very quickly. While, engines cant produce noises which come...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 324, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... direction very quickly. While, engines cant produce noises which come from differen...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31272727273 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44854485375 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574545454545 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5970575513 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9411764706 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1764705882 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.70588235294 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312021632232 0.272083759551 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0939023628282 0.0996497079465 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519768331681 0.0662205650399 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185358698178 0.162205337803 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045186653979 0.0443174109184 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.