Reading mentions several hypothesis which elaborate causes of yellow cedar declination in USA since a century. However, lecturer refused all claims made in the article.
First of all, the author of reading suggests cedar bark beetle which is parasite play significant role in declination of cedar tree. Cedar bark beetle attack cedar trees, the beetle larvae eat the wood. So, bark beetle is good nominate for cedar tree's reduction. On the other hand, professor claims bark beetle is responsible for cedar tree declination. He argues, yellow cedar trees has chemical materials on leafs which has adverse effect on beetle bark body. If beetle eat cedar tree's leaf they will die.
Second, writer suggests declination also attribute to brown bears. Bears claims at the cedar in order to eat tree bark, which has excessive sugar. Bears aggressive feeding behavior may weaken trees to be responsible for tree decline. On contrary, lecturer casts doubt on this point. He says, Bears can not be encounter as the cause of tree decline. Furthermore, he mentioned cedar trees declination not only happened in specific area, it crossed both main land and ire land, which main land is not the living place for bears.
Finally, article suggests changes of climate may also involved in declination of cedar trees. When climate become appear cold, roots of cedar trees may be frozen, which has effects on elimination of growth sense in trees. Root surface growing in winter rather in spring. Wheres, speaker said frozen roots should damage all tress. He puts forth, cold climate will increase the rates of declination for all natural trees, why so only happened for cedar trees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hypothesis seems to be countable; consider using: 'several hypotheses', 'several hypothesises'.
Suggestion: several hypotheses; several hypothesises
Reading mentions several hypothesis which elaborate causes of yellow cedar ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 463, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...has adverse effect on beetle bark body. If beetle eat cedar trees leaf they will d...
^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e cause of tree decline. Furthermore, he mentioned cedar trees declination not on...
^^
Line 3, column 491, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... main land and ire land, which main land is not the living place for bears. Fin...
^^
Line 4, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... trees. When climate become appear cold, roots of cedar trees may be frozen, whic...
^^
Line 4, column 273, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: Where's
...ace growing in winter rather in spring. Wheres, speaker said frozen roots should damag...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 22.412803532 31% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10622710623 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39739042427 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556776556777 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9455452917 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.3684210526 110.228320801 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3684210526 21.698381199 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.31578947368 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.498825255395 0.272083759551 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172077965942 0.0996497079465 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822319330729 0.0662205650399 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283062171606 0.162205337803 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863022016819 0.0443174109184 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.