tpo 24
The reading passage and the talk both discus the studying of animal tissue of the tyrannosaurs which is one of the diansours that a 70 million-year old fossil. The reading agree with that there was animal tissue when the scientist was working on that. But, the lecturer refutes the author's assessment. He demonstrates three reasons to cast doubt on the claim made in the reading.
Firstly, the allegation of the script revealed that there were hollows in the bone and that considered the blood vessel location. Also, there where as soft, flexible organic substance inside the channels. Moreover, that an evidence of the remained actual blood vessels. In contrast to the narrator who claimed that it's not necessary to claim that the soft and flexible substance it was a blood vessel it could be something else other than blood vessels. He poses that those holes it happened because of the bacterial colonization inside the channel and end up with moist and soft residues.
Secondly, the essay claims that there are a spheres and that could be a remaining of red blood cell. According to some tests which showed that these spheres had dark red colors due to some materials like for instance iron to help the red blood cell for transporting oxygen to tissues. The aerator opposed that explanation by saying that there wasn't any blood cell but, the red color might be from different origin not from the dinasour and reddish color it solely a minerals became deposit in that channels.
Thirdly, the writer explained that there was a collagen inside the dinasour's tissues and it is one of the important fibrous protein of the living bone tissue. In controversial to the professor who opposed that idea by saying that the collagen never could exist with a fossil which were thousands years old. Furthermore, he suggest that collagen can't be from the T. rex them-self, it might be from a human skin of the scientist who was work on that study.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 283, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... on that. But, the lecturer refutes the authors assessment. He demonstrates three reaso...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
... the blood vessel location. Also, there where as soft, flexible organic substance inside...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 344, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...d that explanation by saying that there wasnt any blood cell but, the red color might...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 465, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a mineral' or simply 'minerals'?
Suggestion: a mineral; minerals
...he dinasour and reddish color it solely a minerals became deposit in that channels. Thi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 324, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
...re thousands years old. Furthermore, he suggest that collagen cant be from the T. rex t...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 346, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
.... Furthermore, he suggest that collagen cant be from the T. rex them-self, it might ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, for instance, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 28.0 12.0772626932 232% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 332.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85843373494 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50332012081 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527108433735 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4073639834 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.8125 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3125 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.450518129093 0.272083759551 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125320237465 0.0996497079465 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669613368835 0.0662205650399 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227394138833 0.162205337803 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621429404091 0.0443174109184 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.