TPO 24
The article and the lecturer discuss the existence of the red blood cells in dinosaurs, T-rex. Although the article believes T-rex had red blood cells, the lecturer is suspicious about the article's belief.
Firstly, the article demonstrates that a T-rex leg bone was broken by the scientist and examined in order to see what is inside of it. The researchers find holes and soft parts inside of the bone which shows that these holes might be vessels; nevertheless, the lecturer disclaims these holes might have been built by the bacteria which activate came to life after the death of the animals.
Moreover, the article illustrates that finding red spheres shows red blood cells have existed while the professor has another point of view. He thinks that because the red sphere is present in all the fossils found in that area and some of those animals are proved not to have the blood cells, so the red sphere should be something else.
The last controversy is on the existence of collagen, a kind of protein, which demonstrates that tissues in bone have existed. On the other hand, the lecturer says that the collagen cannot last more than a hundred thousand years while T-rex is seventeen million years old, so collagen should not belong to T-rex.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'articles'' or 'article's'?
Suggestion: articles'; article's
...s, the lecturer is suspicious about the articles belief. Firstly, the article demonstr...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, while, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1045.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 214.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88317757009 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40967947197 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 145.348785872 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53738317757 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 419.366225166 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.5414914491 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.625 110.228320801 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 21.698381199 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 7.06452816374 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363516457416 0.272083759551 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157579752799 0.0996497079465 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0295991547993 0.0662205650399 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198454293137 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03299080495 0.0443174109184 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 63.6247240618 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.