TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task
In this set materials, the reading passage state that fossils of Tyrannosaurus have some signs that show some actual tissues of animals. On the other hand, the listening section brings into question the reading by providing different reasons (and examples).
First of all, the reading passage indicates that with analysis of the fossil small branching channels are discovered, this channel maybe shows some blood vessels. In contrast, the lecturer opposes this view by mentioning that this channel cannot show blood vessels, they remain from other animals such as bacteria. The bacteria lived inside bones; therefore, this channel maybe was created by bacteria.
Secondly, the reading passage argues that some examination of bones show that present of spheres that might remain from red blood vessels; conversely, what the lecturer believes is different. He points that we cannot see this sphere thing in another fossil; hence, it could not show blood cells. Also, they could be some pieces of reddish minerals.
Finally, according to the reading, in the examination, scientists find some collagens that lived in the bone tissue. However, the speaker believes that collagen cannot remain from 70 million years. Thus, this collagen perhaps remains from other animals; also, it can remain from the researcher who moves this bone. Because the skin of human has collagens.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 316, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rom the researcher who moves this bone. Because the skin of human has collagens.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in contrast, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1167.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 215.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42790697674 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41557950345 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613953488372 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2440002315 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.25 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9166666667 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5833333333 7.06452816374 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286422699394 0.272083759551 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103797183052 0.0996497079465 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574269883943 0.0662205650399 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168296171938 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656827047355 0.0443174109184 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.