Both the author of the reading and the professor discuss research on living tissues found in T-Rex's bone. The author claims that scientists have found living tissues, which is not usually possible and gives three reasons of support. The professor, however, opposes what claimed in the passage.
First off, the reading states that small channels may include blood vessels, which may also be evidence of the actual blood vessels. The lecturer, on the other hand, believes that they might be a more different organism. Usually, bacterias living inside the bones colonize hollows that resemble channels. So, this finding must be the trace of the bacteria colonize.
According to the article,iron-a material found in a sphere in the bones may be a piece of evidence since it has a dark red center and resemble actual red blood cells in size. The speaker, by contrast, claims that scientists found an identical fossil that might belong to a primitive animal that did not have red blood cells. Thus, that sphere may have a different origin and include reddish minerals.
Lastly, the passage contends that collagen found in a dinosaur's bone may be components of living tissue. The professor, by contrast, rebuts this by explaining that collagen, which is supposed to belong millions of years bones, cannot be older than 100 years ago. Likely explanation must be like that the collagen found in the research does not come from T-Rex but from other animals or a tissue of a researcher handling the bones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 25, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , iron-a
...ia colonize. According to the article,iron-a material found in a sphere in the bones...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, lastly, may, so, thus, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1255.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 249.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04016064257 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.482051179 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55421686747 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4050354194 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5384615385 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1538461538 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355786276161 0.272083759551 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117095227474 0.0996497079465 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074174179449 0.0662205650399 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203591476764 0.162205337803 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720869971717 0.0443174109184 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.