According to the given set of the reading passage, it is the author's conviction that in spite of the fact that study of animal's tissues is not achievable, but recently they have revealed the existing of real tissues on T. rex, which are a kind of Dinosaurs, owing to several highlighted reasons. However, the lecturer casts doubt on this claim and refutes each of the author's specific points by several counter-arguments that are as follows:
First of all, the author posits that some branching channels which are related to the hollows have been observed. On the contrary, the lecturer finds this reason unconvincing by explaining that these channels are remains of bacterias which have left organic materials by construction of colonies.
Secondly, although the author asserts that appearance of spheres which are the remains of red blood cells, the lecturer rejects this reason too by saying that researchers have found primitive animals in the same region, which did not have red blood cells when they were alive. So, it is possible that it is originated from a reddish mineral.
As the last point to emphasize the reading claim, the author says that the existence of collagen, which is the important component of living bone tissue, depicted during experiments. Yet again, the lecturer states on the opposite side and contradicts that it is impossible to observe the mentioned component in an animal with 70-million-years-old. The best explanation for the existence of that is other sources such as human skin, which is pure of collagen, as a result, collagen has transferred from researcher’s skins.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...n set of the reading passage, it is the authors conviction that in spite of the fact th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, kind of, such as, as a result, first of all, in spite of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19083969466 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99175293602 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568702290076 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.9266921366 49.2860985944 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.111111111 110.228320801 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1111111111 21.698381199 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.3333333333 7.06452816374 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248280753885 0.272083759551 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871776242471 0.0996497079465 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602943844755 0.0662205650399 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138139335308 0.162205337803 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581245086821 0.0443174109184 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.3589403974 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.8541721854 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.