Based on the reading material, it is stated that there are viable reasons scientists believe that the fossilized leg bone of T.rex, a dinosaur, contains remains of the actual tissues of the animal. However, the lecturer finds this idea bereft of sufficient reasoning and represents some ideas to the contrary.
Initially, the author argued that the presence of a soft, legible substance inside the bone's branching channels may represent the remains of the blood vessels of T.rex . That being said, the lecturer repudiated this idea by clarifying that long after a dinosaur is dead, some bacteria will colonize hollows in the bones and often leave behind traces of a chemical material. Thus, it stands to reason that the presence of the soft substance inside the fossil cannot be a clue for the blood vessels of T.rex.
Another point mentioned in the reading passage was that microscopic examinations revealed the presence of spheres, which might be related to the red blood cells. However, the lecturer rejected this one too by stating that scientists have found fossils of other primitive animals, which had no red blood cells, in the same area. So, these spheres must be in red color for a different reason, like a reddish mineral or something like that.
The final point advanced in the reading passage was that the existence of collagen in the fossil may represent remains of bone tissues of T.rex . Yet again, the lecturer casted doubt on this idea. He said that collagen cannot last more than 100,000 years, whereas the fossil belongs to seventy million years ago. So, there must be another explanation for the presence of the collagen in the bone. The professor cites that human's skin has a plethora of collagen, thus the collagen may have come from the skin of the researchers to the fossil sample.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 168, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...he remains of the blood vessels of T.rex . That being said, the lecturer repudiate...
^^
Line 4, column 144, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...present remains of bone tissues of T.rex . Yet again, the lecturer casted doubt on...
^^
Line 4, column 549, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f the researchers to the fossil sample.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, thus, whereas, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 304.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95394736842 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46057381769 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546052631579 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1045472533 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.846153846 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.23076923077 7.06452816374 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42562242417 0.272083759551 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14702340055 0.0996497079465 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0868243095191 0.0662205650399 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243213223937 0.162205337803 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398772850207 0.0443174109184 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.