The reading and the lecture both discuss recent discovery of fossil of Tyrannosaurus. While the reading claims that the researchers found remains of actual tissues of the animal, the professor refutes, saying that this claim is skeptical,and contradicts the arguments made in the article.
First, the reading states that small branching channels in the leg bone resemble the hollows in the bones where blood vessels were found. However, the professor indicates that the material found in theses hollows are colonized bacteria which often turned into organic material. So, it could be just bacterial residue.
Secondly, the article asserts that the spheres found in the microscopic examination are more likely to be red blood cells. This point is challenged by the professor. He explains that identical spheres were found in other fossil which did not have red blood cells. So, these spheres could be just reddish minerals.
Finally, the article posits that the research revealed that there was collagen in the fossil. The professor opposes this point by stating that collagen has never been found in fossil more than hundred years ago. Therefore, the professor assumes that this collagen material could be from recent source such as the skin of the researchers who handled the fossil.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
...tes, saying that this claim is skeptical,and contradicts the arguments made in the a...
^^^^
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...as never been found in fossil more than hundred years ago. Therefore, the professor ass...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 205.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32195121951 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50736452456 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575609756098 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.4862584236 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9166666667 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0833333333 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321335134697 0.272083759551 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114326088115 0.0996497079465 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721065948383 0.0662205650399 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182087418878 0.162205337803 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059282884198 0.0443174109184 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.