TPO 24-T.rex fossil
The lecture and the passage discuss some evidence in an ancient fossil. Although the passage claims that through three evidences this fossil has animal's tissues, the speaker refutes this idea through a number of reasons which will be described in this report.
First and foremost, the passage points out that the breaking of the leg bone has exhibited some small branches channels which they might be hollows for vessels locations. The speaker, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that this hollows could be created by some bacterias colonizing in the body which have been left behind after the death. This means that this hollows might be a trace residual of the colonizing of this bacterias.
Furthermore, unlike the passage which states that the presence of the spheres could be an evidence of remaining the red blood cells inside the bones, the professor argues that this fossil has been found adjancent to the other fossils which did not have red blood cells. He aslo adds that this spheres probably can be originated from reddish minerals.
Finally, although the passage says that a test which have been conducted by scientists showed the presence of the collagen, the professor disagress by mentioning that the collagen cannot lasted for a long time and the test result is contradict by this scientific theory. He also states that the collagen has other sources like human's skin; therefore, this collagen could be originated from the skin of the person who was handing the bone.
Through these reasons which have been described above, the passage claims are rejected by the professor.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...have red blood cells. He aslo adds that this spheres probably can be originated from...
^^^^
Line 7, column 234, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'contradicted'.
Suggestion: contradicted
... for a long time and the test result is contradict by this scientific theory. He also stat...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 263.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11406844106 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38774793388 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520912547529 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.6716826647 49.2860985944 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.5 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3 21.698381199 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259258141079 0.272083759551 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102155258589 0.0996497079465 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712625291671 0.0662205650399 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137969470597 0.162205337803 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0837847397347 0.0443174109184 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.