TPO-25
The article states that an archaeologist in Iraq found a clay jar with copper vessels. He thought that it might be a battery because if it filled with liquids, it will produce electricity. The passage rejects that assumption with three reasons. However, the professor explains that the vessel can be a buttery and reject all reasons of passage.
First, the reading claims that if the vessel was a battery, some wires should be founded around it, but the archaeologist did not find any wire. The professor opposes this point by saying that vessel was founded by local people and they probably did not consider wires and discard them.
Second, the passage states that the copper cylinders are similar to ones discovered in Seleucia. Those cylinders were used to hold the scrolls texts, and they were not for battery. In front, professor mentions that they may use them for holding the scroll, but during the time they found that they can use it as a battery.
Third, the passage mentions that there was no electricity usage for people on that time even if it is a battery, but the professor says that there were many works that they could do with electricity. For example, body shocking, magic power, medicine, and so on.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1012.0 1373.03311258 74% => OK
No of words: 211.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79620853081 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4335927579 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57345971564 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 419.366225166 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5939375843 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404645602642 0.272083759551 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141652481103 0.0996497079465 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880770606133 0.0662205650399 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216240228053 0.162205337803 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729337822148 0.0443174109184 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.