TPO 31
A dinosaur called Sinosauropteryx was found in 1996, preserved in volcanic ash. There is a pattern of fine lines around the skeletal bones which are considered as feather evidence by some scientists; however, some critics refute the scientist's assumption. The article presents three reasons for critic's support. Conversely, the professor says that the mentioned reasons are not convincing, and refuses all of them.
First, the reading claims that the fine lines might have appeared after the dinosaur's death. They might be a decomposed skin by volcanic ash. The professor opposes this point by saying that there is no decomposition evidence, and the lines cannot be fibers.
Second, the text asserts that scientists have no certain explanation about the function of it, and they might be the remains of frills, an ornamental fan-shape structures growing out of their bodies. In contrast, the lecturer states that there is a kind of protein in the feather which is not presented in frills, and the research shows that the lines contain the protein which is allocated to feather.
Third, the passage posits that the feather's function is for flying or temperature regulating. Since the fine lines are on the backbone and the tail of the animal, it cannot provides its function as a feather. On the contrary, the lecturer mentions that there are other functions for feathers; for example, some birds which use their feathers due to attract the mate, so the dinosaur can have feathers on its back for this purpose.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'scientists'' or 'scientist's'?
Suggestion: scientists'; scientist's
...tists; however, some critics refute the scientists assumption. The article presents three ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'dinosaurs'' or 'dinosaur's'?
Suggestion: dinosaurs'; dinosaur's
...ine lines might have appeared after the dinosaurs death. They might be a decomposed skin ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, second, so, third, for example, in contrast, kind of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1273.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 248.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13306451613 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67722198554 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54435483871 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9553309377 49.2860985944 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.083333333 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.06452816374 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390996917108 0.272083759551 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131857356624 0.0996497079465 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737146249202 0.0662205650399 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220298334685 0.162205337803 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262028095325 0.0443174109184 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.