TPO 32
The article states that sailors in Russian submarines hear strange sounds that moved fast, and detection facilities could not find any movement under water. The article provides three hypothesis may cause that sound. In the listening, the professor states that the reasons are not satisfying and rejects all the assumption on by on.
First, the reading declares that the sound may be produced by Orca whales. Typically, whales use odd noises to make communication. On the contrary, the professor states that whales live near the surface of the water, while Russian submarine took place in a deep level of water. So it was impossible for sailors to hear whales voice.
Second, the text suggests that the sounds probably were caused by giant squid. It states that these animals have soft skin and intelligent mind that helped them to hide from submarine radars. On the other side of the issue, the professor mentions that giant squid could not be reasons of that bizarre voice because the sailors stated that the sound stopped suddenly, but giant squids could not be disappeared suddenly.
Third, the reading asserts that they may hear the sound from other military technologies like other submarines, and they could not be registered because of their undetectable facilities. In contrast, the professor says that it is not possible because submarines cannot move and change their direction quickly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hypothesis' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hypotheses', 'hypothesises'.
Suggestion: hypotheses; hypothesises
...under water. The article provides three hypothesis may cause that sound. In the listening,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
..., the professor states that the reasons are not satisfying and rejects all the assumption on by on...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, may, second, so, third, while, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1182.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 227.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20704845815 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52755967277 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57268722467 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.8900195374 49.2860985944 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9166666667 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361583194179 0.272083759551 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122137964587 0.0996497079465 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655137440059 0.0662205650399 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207335908277 0.162205337803 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355868914773 0.0443174109184 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.