The lecture and the reading passage both discuss vessels -- ancient electric batteries that can produce a small electric energy. The reading claims that people did not used electric batteries because there were not evidence facts that support this opinion. However, the professor in the lecture challenges the suggestions stated by the author and disprove all of the facts by proving them scientifically wrong.
First of all, the text indicate that vessels used as batteries, attaching to metal wires, but there are not any material near the vessels's location. The professor refutes this and says that local people found these vessels and they probably did not acquired other significant parts that could connect with vessels.
Secondly, the text puts that part of vessels was discovered in Seleucie -- the aria near ancient city location. According to the text nearby area used this part for holding scrolls, but not for generating energy. The professor counter this point by saying that Seleucie could use this part originally for holding scrolls of sacred texts, but then they changed a specialization of this detail.
The reading points that ancient people did not have devices that replied on electricity. The lecture denies this and talks that people used batteries for producing shock. Moreover, they used electric energy such as a medical tool.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'use'
Suggestion: use
... The reading claims that people did not used electric batteries because there were n...
^^^^
Line 1, column 357, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...tions stated by the author and disprove all of the facts by proving them scientifically w...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 367, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed by the author and disprove all of the facts by proving them scientifically wro...
^^
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'acquire'
Suggestion: acquire
...these vessels and they probably did not acquired other significant parts that could conn...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 90, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ve devices that replied on electricity. The lecture denies this and talks that peop...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1147.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 215.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33488372093 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47325089568 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558139534884 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0172135155 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.272727273 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5454545455 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63636363636 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305199049124 0.272083759551 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120181382776 0.0996497079465 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041742677153 0.0662205650399 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188584582606 0.162205337803 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026908313653 0.0443174109184 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.