TPO-25 - Integrated Writing Task

Essay topics:

TPO-25 - Integrated Writing Task

The passage discusses a set of clay jars that found in Iraq. The pasage describes that using these vessels as batteries is not convincing and provides three reasons to support that. In contrast, the professor rebuts all these three rasons by stating that there is a chanse these vesseles were used as batteries by ancient people.
First, the reading claims that because of absence ofmetal wire we can not consider these vessels as somethings to produce electricity. However, the lecture rejects this reasin by explaining that these vessels have found by regular people who do not know anything about axcavation. So, they might ignore the wires and consider them as useless stuff. As you can see, the reason that mentioned in the text is inconvincing.
Second, the article asserts that the copper cylinders inside the jars are similar to copper cylinders which discovered in other place. These things were used for holding scrolls. So, there is a chance that these sylinders were used to the same action. While the professors refutes this reason and states this prove anything. Furthermore, the theacher explaines that mabe after a while ancient people found that by applying liquid they could produce electricity.
Thirs, the text contends that what could ancient people have done with the electricity? Consequently, the passage describes that ancient people had no such electrical devices. So, using electricity was a nonsense. However, the woman in the lecture opposes this idea by describing that perhaps ancient doctors use this weird device as a tool to cure people, or even people can use from this device as a magic tool.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, second, so, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11235955056 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5187258956 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565543071161 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8390165834 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3125 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6875 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 7.06452816374 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351598189005 0.272083759551 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110273600769 0.0996497079465 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514376079849 0.0662205650399 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198615790206 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333858518318 0.0443174109184 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.