tpo 25 the vessels were used electric batteries
The material discusses that the vessels that was discovered on Irap were used as electric batteries. While the reading says that it is not likely that the vessels wered used as electric batteries, the listening challenges this and states that batteries are a good explaination of the vessels' usage.
First, the author mentions that if the vessels were used as batteries, they should have been attached to some conductors. On the other hand, the professor opposes this and posits that these vessels were discovered by local people, not trained archaeologist. The lecturer adds that they might find conductors, but they did not know their importance. The listening points out that these conductors might be there, but they seemed to be unintersting to the local people.
Second, the writer states that these vessels look like the copper cylinders that were used for holding scrolls. On the contrary, the professor contradicts this and mentions that these vessels might be used originally to hold scrolls. The ecturer adds that latter they foud that they could produce electricity with a specific liquid. the listening explains that the vessels could be used for one purpose then adapted to another one.
Third, the reading states that ancient people did not have any purpose to use electricity. Conversely, the listening refutes this and states that ancient people could use it as invisible power or to convince others that they had a magical power. The speaker adds that modern phsicians use power in medical purposes, such as revealing pain, so ancient people might use electricity for the same reason.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat batteries are a good explaination of the vessels usage. First, the author m...
^^
Line 1, column 286, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'vessels'' or 'vessel's'?
Suggestion: vessels'; vessel's
...tteries are a good explaination of the vessels usage. First, the author mentions tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...uce electricity with a specific liquid. the listening explains that the vessels cou...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, if, look, second, so, then, third, while, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 261.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16475095785 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56080902059 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509578544061 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 410.4 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1479586089 49.2860985944 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.692307692 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06452816374 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406163250057 0.272083759551 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161478087644 0.0996497079465 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0910081630283 0.0662205650399 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258446171017 0.162205337803 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608950639729 0.0443174109184 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.