TPO 27-integrated

Essay topics:

TPO 27-integrated

In the reading, the author claims that there are several theories, which contribute to rationales behind the little ice age. However, finding all the ideas implausible and questionable, the lecturer totally repudiates the claim and presents some evidence to the contrary.

First of all, the reading passage argues that due to warmer weather before the little ice age, changing gulf stream is responsible for decreasing the temperature and onset of ice age. Conversely, the lecturer refutes this point by explaining that scientists know that disrupting the ocean stream just affects Europe and North America. However, the little ice age occurred in the southern hemisphere such as New Zealand and south Africa.

Furthermore, the author mentions that dark cloud of dust, which were resulted from volcanic eruption is one of the reasons of forming the little ice age. On the other hand, the lecturer disagrees with this opinion. According to him, the dusts which came from volcanic eruptions would have visible effects such as colorful sunset and gray or brown snow. However, there was no evidence to prove these visual impacts of dark cloud's dust.

Finally, the reading holds the view that the temperature was decreased because of absorbing a great deal of carbon dioxide by trees in order to fewer farmlands cut for feeding people. In contrary, the professor claims that the human population during that time grew back quickly. Therefore, the people tried to cut the trees for producing crops as a food source. Thus, there was not enough time for absorbing carbon dioxide by trees.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'such as', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.257839721254 0.261695866417 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.149825783972 0.158904122519 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.104529616725 0.0723426182421 144% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0487804878049 0.0435111971325 112% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00348432055749 0.0277247811725 13% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.12543554007 0.128828473217 97% => OK
Participles: 0.0487804878049 0.0370669169778 132% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.49899372623 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0243902439024 0.0208969081088 117% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.121951219512 0.128158765124 95% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00348432055749 0.0158828679856 22% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.01393728223 0.0114777025283 121% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1587.0 1645.83664459 96% => OK
No of words: 257.0 271.125827815 95% => OK
Chars per words: 6.17509727626 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04852973271 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.381322957198 0.374372842146 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.287937743191 0.287516216867 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.20233463035 0.187439937562 108% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.112840466926 0.113142543107 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49899372623 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614785992218 0.539623497131 114% => OK
Word variations: 66.0315602806 53.8517498576 123% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.7692307692 21.7502111507 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.150751428 49.3711431718 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.076923077 132.220823453 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7692307692 21.7502111507 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.923076923077 0.878197800319 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 48.5630050883 50.5018328374 96% => OK
Elegance: 2.13793103448 1.90840788429 112% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.666145968178 0.549887131256 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0997211541585 0.142949733639 70% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0486038958858 0.0787303798458 62% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.591135653215 0.631733273073 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.150491958979 0.139662658121 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.293133467848 0.266732575781 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1204972375 0.103435571967 116% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.397774195024 0.414875509568 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0919870636471 0.0530846634433 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.479668383855 0.40443939384 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458936160756 0.0528353158467 87% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.26048565121 164% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 3.1766004415 189% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.