sometimes we are assigned to work in a group on a project. do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
the group will be helped more by a person who will be willing to do what other group members want than by a person
who often strongly insists that things should be done in a way that is different from what the group wants to do
No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the fact that in this competitive job market, having an effective collaboration between team members in a group plays a crucial role in the success of projects. For getting favorable results, group members should have a good communication skill. It means that having a respectful manner toward each other's opinion is really essential. Some may think that the group will have a good progress if a person tends to do what other team members want. While others may believe
that the group would not be helped by one who persists in doing things which are different from what other members desired. I firmly concur with the former group's idea. In what follows, my reasons supporting this opinion would be delineated.
To begin with, it is clearly evident that a key factor in achieving a common goal in a group is to pay careful attention to all members' ideas and eventually make decisions based on their desire. In this way, group members can take part in projects with more motivation because the sense of usefulness in them would increase. They will give it their best shot to make an effective suggestion or solution which make the projects progress. Moreover, they will work enthusiastically even more than expected time. Therefore, it may be possible that the group can finish the project on or ahead of schedule. By way of illustration, when I worked as a team leader in a computer company, in order to design a brand-new antivirus software, I asked team members to come up with new ideas. After a while, I got some feedback on the task. Most of them tended to write our new software with Microsoft C thanks to its great running speed. However, according to my previous experience, I preferred to utilize another language programming. At last, by writing program based on group members’ opinion, the project has been done well before its due time. It should be noted that during doing the project my colleagues' incentive enhanced and most of them focused on their work vigorously because of our mutual respectful behavior.
The second reason is rooted in the fact that Reaching consensus and doing tasks in a way that other team members want, lead the project to get its best outcome because every member will concentrate on her/his job with much more attention. As a rule of thumb, if people did their tasks reluctantly, the project would have less quality. Therefore, as group member figure out their viewpoints are significant they will do the job in the best manner. Thus, the project is done not only with high standard but also with more efficiency. For instance, looking back on the previous example at the computer company, my teammates applied all of their knowledge and determination to succeed in writing an efficient anti-virus program. As it turns out; by accepting group members proposition, our company accomplished the best anti-virus application amongst other competitors.
In short, all the aforementioned grounds lead us to draw a conclusion that group would achieve its aim by a person who is willing to do things which are accepted by other members than in a way that is opposite to others' inclination. There are two considerable influences on the project progress. It will do both efficiently and on time because of increasing team members' motivation and exploiting all of their knowledge energetically.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 338, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
... having a respectful manner toward each others opinion is really essential. Some may t...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 383, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'thinks'.
Suggestion: thinks
...s opinion is really essential. Some may think that the group will have a good progres...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 484, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nds to do what other team members want. While others may believe that the group woul...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
...esired. I firmly concur with the former groups idea. In what follows, my reasons suppo...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ting this opinion would be delineated. To begin with, it is clearly evident th...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...use of our mutual respectful behavior. The second reason is rooted in the fact...
^^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...application amongst other competitors. In short, all the aforementioned ground...
^^^^^^
Line 12, column 365, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'members'' or 'member's'?
Suggestion: members'; member's
... and on time because of increasing team members motivation and exploiting all of their ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, moreover, really, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in short, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 82.0 52.1666666667 157% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2826.0 1977.66487455 143% => OK
No of words: 569.0 407.700716846 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96660808436 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88402711743 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80004950698 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 287.0 212.727598566 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504393673111 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 862.2 618.680645161 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0133404542 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.666666667 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0740740741 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384738106426 0.236089414692 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103260976813 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835834779203 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240166929082 0.150856017488 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314638089068 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 86.8835125448 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.