TPO 27 Integrated
The professor explains three clear arguments opposing the points stated in the reading passage about plausible theories of the little ice age phenomena.
First, the reading passage claims that disruption of ocean currents could have had severe impact on the little ice age. It believes that cool freshwater of melted glaciers, which transported to golf stream, made chaos in Golf Stream's currents and affected Earth's climate. Nevertheless, the professor argues that Golf stream has only influence on European and some Asian areas whereas the little ice age was spread to vast parts of world especially southern hemisphere like New Zealand. Thus, this idea can not be reasonable and should be rejected.
Second,the professor opposes the idea presented in the reading about effect of volcanic eruptions' dust on prevention of sunlight which cause serious temperature decline. The professor sees that if volcanic eruptions could be able to emission such large amount of dust to Earth's climate, it would be changed sky's color due to dust and other chemical particles. However, we do not have any reports about such events.
Third and last, the reading passage asserts that decrease in human population may have cause of the little ice age so that humans' population declined before the little ice age and early of it, suggesting that forest trees covered in many lands and triggered major declination in temperature by absorbing carbon dioxide. In contrast, the professor disproves the idea due to the fact that there was not enough time for forest to grow because humans' population started to grow rapidly after short time period and forests had been cut down again. Therefore, this hypothesis is repudiates by professor either.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 7, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...onable and should be rejected. Second,the professor opposes the idea presented in...
^^^^
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'earth'.
Suggestion: Earth
...o emission such large amount of dust to Earths climate, it would be changed skys color...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 124, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...ave cause of the little ice age so that humans population declined before the little i...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, thus, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 277.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25631768953 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55229295436 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602888086643 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.0435103 49.2860985944 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.363636364 110.228320801 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1818181818 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.63636363636 7.06452816374 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.43165931754 0.272083759551 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13793234309 0.0996497079465 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10326160477 0.0662205650399 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228888602331 0.162205337803 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0934172044323 0.0443174109184 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.3589403974 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.