Between the year 1350 until 1900CE the earth experienced a kind of ice age. Many parts of the world reached to the unusually cold temperature during the harsh winters and some events of the previous ice age became advent again. The scientist called this era "Little Ice Age". He had three reasons for his claim. But the professor opposed to his view about the causes of the little ice age.
First, According to the passage, disrupting of ocean currents could decrease the temperature during the little ice age. During the unusually warm period before the little ice age a huge amount of glaciers melted and the resulting cold water transformed to the Gulf Stream. Although Gulf Stream disrupted with the addition of cold water but, as the professor mentioned it just could manipulat the wheather of Europe and North America. Scientific evidences shows the whole world experienced this cold weather which consists the southern Africa and Newzeland, so the professor opposed to this claim.
Second, However, the passage claimed that the volcanic eruption could cause the little ice age with its dark clouds of dust and sulfur gas but the professor says the amount of these volcanic eruption products were not enough to affect the whole world and there is no evidence of gray snow or chaning in sunrise.
Finally, Although the human population decreased at the first of the little ice age and a few years before that, but the professor claimed the population increased immediately after a while and the forests which consumed the carbon dioxide decreased and replaced with farms.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts of the world reached to the unusually cold temperature during the harsh winter...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 263.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06844106464 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46794130572 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562737642586 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.46922792 49.2860985944 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.181818182 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9090909091 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.488729151346 0.272083759551 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194908394346 0.0996497079465 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0939895080594 0.0662205650399 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288703435993 0.162205337803 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624165189157 0.0443174109184 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.