According to the reading passage, the glass is one of the popular building materials used in the construction of buildings. The author mentions that the glass can be dangerous for birds as they think there are open spaces in the building and so try to fly through them. The reading passage provides three reasons to refute the proposed problem. However, the professor argues that all of them seem impractical.
The first solution is that the constructors can implement one-way glasses to reduce the probability of bird strikes. Although the one-way glasses only are transparent for inside occupants, as the professor states in the lecture they reflect the lights same as the mirrors. Also, he adds that these reflections can resemble an image of a tree or the sky, consequently they seem such as the open spaces for the birds. Therefore, this trick cannot be practical and maybe it fails.
The second method is that the architectures can use glasses with some stripes on them. The professor claims that this method cannot be feasible by virtue of the birds see the holes and they may try to pass through these holes. In conclusion, according to the professor, they should use windows with extremely small holes but in the result, the inside becomes too dark. That’s why he thinks this method still ineffective.
The last method introduced in the passage is that the constructors can use the magnetic field to repel the birds outward. Even though the birds use the earth magnetic field to navigate themselves but as the professor asserts they use it in the long-distance trips for example when they decide to migrate from north to south in winter. Consequently, this method doesn’t work truly on account of they use their visions for navigation over small distances.
In brief, the professor and author give their contradicting ideas on the feasibility of the using glasses in buildings without causing any troubles for the birds. The professor refuses all the proposed solutions and argues that those methods are entirely useless.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, may, second, so, still, therefore, for example, in brief, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 338.0 270.72406181 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05621301775 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69272543739 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523668639053 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4100093805 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.529411765 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8823529412 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11764705882 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391519313474 0.272083759551 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121154192895 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911635603574 0.0662205650399 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214112970498 0.162205337803 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618999837773 0.0443174109184 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.