TPO 28
In this set of materials, the reading passage states that Robert E. Peary reached the North Pole in 1909, and it brings several strong reasons for this claim. On the other hand, the listening section brings into question the reading points by providing different reasons (and examples).
First and foremost, the reading indicates that the National Geographic Society sent a committee for searching for Robert's claims, and they declared that Robert had reached the North Pole. In contrast, the speaker opposes this view by mentioning that this committee was not objective; because the members of a committee were Robert's close friends. And they spend a lot of money on Robber's trip. Also, they searched only 2 days of investigation, so this reporter would not be careful and accurate. It seems biased and trustworthy.
Furthermore, the reading argues that Tom Avery could reach the North Pole in the less than 37 days, and he had the same trek as Robert, so it supports Peary’s claim. Conversely, what the lecturer state is different. She points out that Tome condition was different from Robert condition. Tome carried much less weight than Robert because his food was carried by helicopter. Also, the weather condition was favorable than Robert weather condition. Indeed, the Tom Avery condition was not the same as Robert's condition, and it is not profit for Robert's claim.
Finally, according to the reading, measuring the shadows of Robert's photographs shows that the Surf position has the correct position as it should have been at the North Pole on that day. However, the professor believes that this measuring does not prove any things. Also, the photographs are fuzzy and slightly. Thus, new persist measuring shadows do not show the correct sun position.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 27, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hotographs are fuzzy and slightly. Thus, new persist measuring shadows do not sho...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 289.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26989619377 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57945423075 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553633217993 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.9217791153 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.6111111111 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0555555556 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376674667401 0.272083759551 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986243010627 0.0996497079465 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127575551247 0.0662205650399 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202276216228 0.162205337803 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368694358437 0.0443174109184 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.