Tpo 28- integrated writing
In this set materials, the reading passage state that the claim's Robert about reaches the North Pole is true. However, the listening section brings into question the reading points by providing different reasons (and examples).
First of all, the reading passage indicates that the National Geographic Society was sent a committee to search for Robert's claim, and they said that Robert's claim was true. In contrast, the lecturer opposes this view by mentioning that the National Geographic committee was close friends of Roberts, and they spend much money on Robert's trip; therefore, this committee was not objective. Also, they have searched only for 2 days; hence, it was not trusted and it was biased.
Second, the reading indicates that Roberts could travel to the North Pole in 37 days because Tome Avery also reached the North Pole in 37 days; conversely, what the lecturer believes is different. She points that the situation of Tome was completely different from Robert. Tomes has fewer weigh that used for travelling and he did not carry foods, and foods were sent to tome by air plain. In addition, the environmental situation when tom travelled, was very favourable that Roberts situation.
Finally, according to the reading, by measuring shadows from Robert's photos could calculate the position of the sun that shows exactly the situation of the sun on this day. However, the speaker claims that the measuring shadow is very precisely and not shows the exact position of the sun. Also, the photos of the Robers were fuzzy. And, these photos become fade and dark during a time. Hence, we could not calculate the sun position.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, in addition, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10332103321 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44637480019 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531365313653 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0279094786 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7857142857 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25591662634 0.272083759551 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818367548251 0.0996497079465 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693294847307 0.0662205650399 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146325494668 0.162205337803 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383994392683 0.0443174109184 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.