According to the given set of the reading passage, it is the author's conviction that Robert E.Peary, a renowned adventurer explorer, could reach to the North Pole in 1909 owing to several highlighted supports. On the contrary, the lecturer casts doubt on this justification and repudiates each of the author's specific point by providing several counter-arguments that are as follows:
First of all, the reading holds the view that based on the outcomes and records of the National Geographic Society, Robert E.Peary could investigate the North Pole. However, the lecturer finds this reason unconvincing owing to the fact that the major members of this society consisted of Robert E.Peary's close friends who spent a huge amount of money for his journey. In addition, this committee held on just two days and did not examine carefully and as a result, all members behaved biased. So, this support does not make any sense.
Secondly, although the author posits that the trip of Tom Avery, who was a British explorer, took less than 37 days and thus this substantiate Robert E.Peary's trip, the lecturer refutes this point too by asserting that the travel of these two explorers is different in some specific facets. For instance, Tom Avery traveled this distance in a favorable weather condition. So, this support seems to be implausible as well.
As the last point to emphasize the reading belief, the author says that captured photographs by Robert E.Peary are the most significant witnesses for his arrival. Yet again, the lecturer states on the opposite side and contradicts that we are not able to determine the exact position of the sun meticulously using shadows. This is mostly owing to the fact that Robert E.Peary captured these photographs by a primitive camera, which might not be able to focus very well. Also, these photographs have been faded over time and as a result, it is too hard to measure the shadows of them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...n set of the reading passage, it is the authors conviction that Robert E.Peary, a renow...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Peary
...is the authors conviction that Robert E.Peary, a renowned adventurer explorer, could ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Peary
...e National Geographic Society, Robert E.Peary could investigate the North Pole. Howev...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Pearys
...s of this society consisted of Robert E.Pearys close friends who spent a huge amount o...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Pearys
...ays and thus this substantiate Robert E.Pearys trip, the lecturer refutes this point t...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Peary
...s that captured photographs by Robert E.Peary are the most significant witnesses for ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
... captured photographs by Robert E.Peary are the most significant witnesses for his ...
^^^
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Peary) must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
... captured photographs by Robert E.Peary are the most significant witnesses for his ...
^^^
Line 7, column 371, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Peary
... mostly owing to the fact that Robert E.Peary captured these photographs by a primiti...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for instance, in addition, as a result, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 322.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02173913043 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68585426345 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552795031056 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.8008576507 49.2860985944 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.75 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 21.698381199 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 7.06452816374 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303833192884 0.272083759551 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978392213643 0.0996497079465 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047136692727 0.0662205650399 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168123169193 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284650221193 0.0443174109184 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.3589403974 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.7273730684 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.