In this set of materials, the article introduces three reasons to support the Pearys's claim about reaching North Pole in 1909. However, the lecturer raises questions on the ideas and presents some evidence to refute them all.
First of all, the author of the reading passage asserts that a committee of National Geographic Society investigated about Peary's adventure and this committee approved his claim. In the contrary, the professor mentions that this committee was Peary's close friends; therefore, they were biased towards their friend. According to the speaker, they just spent 2 days to study Peary's travel to North Pole and they couldn't examine exactly about the details of Peary's adventure, so this committee's verdict is not trustworthy.
Furthermore, the article posits that Tom Avery could reach the North Pole in less than 37 days, so Peary's travel in 37 days is not impossible at that time. Conversely, the professor believes that these two travels by Tom Avery and Peary were different in several aspects. She indicates that Peary's dogsled had more weight because he had to bring the food that he needed during his travel. While, Tom Avery received his food by a supporting airplane. Also, Peary experienced harder climate during his journey, subsequently Avery traveled faster than Peary.
Finally, the professor was not convinced that photographs taken by Peary is a secure reason to supports his claim, which is the last mentioned evidence in the reading passage. The speaker says that this picture belongs to 100 years ago, consequently, the shadows are faded over time meanwhile examining Peary's travel need more accurate picture. Moreover, researchers studied this picture very precisely and they concluded different results.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 411, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...dy Pearys travel to North Pole and they couldnt examine exactly about the details of Pe...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 482, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'committees'' or 'committee's'?
Suggestion: committees'; committee's
...he details of Pearys adventure, so this committees verdict is not trustworthy. Furtherm...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... food that he needed during his travel. While, Tom Avery received his food by a suppo...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'consequently', 'conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.300970873786 0.261695866417 115% => OK
Verbs: 0.142394822006 0.158904122519 90% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0550161812298 0.0723426182421 76% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0614886731392 0.0435111971325 141% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0453074433657 0.0277247811725 163% => OK
Prepositions: 0.116504854369 0.128828473217 90% => OK
Participles: 0.0258899676375 0.0370669169778 70% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.58942174623 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0258899676375 0.0208969081088 124% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.10355987055 0.128158765124 81% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00323624595469 0.0158828679856 20% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00323624595469 0.0114777025283 28% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1752.0 1645.83664459 106% => OK
No of words: 277.0 271.125827815 102% => OK
Chars per words: 6.32490974729 6.08160592843 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.04852973271 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.418772563177 0.374372842146 112% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.321299638989 0.287516216867 112% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.216606498195 0.187439937562 116% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.137184115523 0.113142543107 121% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58942174623 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606498194946 0.539623497131 112% => OK
Word variations: 66.024466477 53.8517498576 123% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.3076923077 21.7502111507 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2104019528 49.3711431718 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.769230769 132.220823453 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 21.7502111507 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 53.4376562066 50.5018328374 106% => OK
Elegance: 1.77922077922 1.90840788429 93% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.624853330284 0.549887131256 114% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.120707192104 0.142949733639 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0533857674615 0.0787303798458 68% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.553400859269 0.631733273073 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.13305452525 0.139662658121 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.250151744382 0.266732575781 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118775266361 0.103435571967 115% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.28994954075 0.414875509568 70% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0443778879219 0.0530846634433 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.431946068214 0.40443939384 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275454873032 0.0528353158467 52% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.26048565121 141% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 3.62251655629 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 10.2958057395 78% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.