TPO 29- Integrated
The reading part proposes that the elephant-sized Edmontosaur survived the winter and its adverse climate in Alaska’s North Slope by migrating south to the more favorable region. Then it brings up some arguments supporting the migration hypothesis. However, the professor finds these surmises dubious and refutes them all.
The first problem with the reading passage is the idea of Edmontosaurs’ diet that supports the migration hypothesis. As Edmontosaurs fed only on plants, they had to migrate to more temperate climate to find food, which was not available in the winter season in Alaska's North Slope. On the contrary, the lecturer in the speaking part maintains that Alaska's North Slope was warmer than it is today. On the other hand, in the summertime in Alaska's North Slope, there is 24-hour sunlight which provides a circumstance plants can overgrow. Hence, there was plenty of vegetation there and made possible that Edmontosaur had sufficient food like dead plants in the winter to feed on.
Another bug with the reading part is that Edmontosaurs lived in herd results in they took benefit of living in herd to migrate as some modern-day cattle like buffalos or caribous do. In contrast, the professor undermines this idea by asserting that living in herd also has other meaning like to increase their protection from predators. For example, a type of elks in the arctic forest live in a herd, but they do not migrate. Ergo, drawing the conclusion that Edmontosaurs lived in a herd in order to better coordinate their migration is an inconclusive and rudimentary outcome.
A third trouble with the passage is that the reading contends that Edmontosaurs were physically capable enough to migrate long distances. Contrarily, the professor undercuts this idea owing to the fact that also Edmontosaur had offspring, dependent on their parents to survive, they could not leave them behind in Alaska's North Slope. In fact, the idea of being powerful enough seems inconclusive hypothesis to support the migration hypothesis.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: THE_FALL_SEASON[1]
Message: Use simply 'winter'.
Suggestion: winter
...o find food, which was not available in the winter season in Alaskas North Slope. On the contrary...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: SUMMER_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'summer'.
Suggestion: summer
... it is today. On the other hand, in the summertime in Alaskas North Slope, there is 24-hou...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, so, then, third, for example, in contrast, in fact, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 30.3222958057 168% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1373.03311258 125% => OK
No of words: 327.0 270.72406181 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26605504587 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88977071983 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535168195719 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7353356359 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.8 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419713144791 0.272083759551 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145607852847 0.0996497079465 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755936694885 0.0662205650399 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262081767929 0.162205337803 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397471423655 0.0443174109184 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.