The reading and the lecture are both about the extreme weather condition in the North Slope in Alaska, which may caused the migration of edmonosaurus. The author of the reading implies that the cold temperature was not tolerable for edmonosaurus, for this reason they may migrated during the winter to south. The lecturer challenges the statements made by the author. She indicates that they did not migrate to south for some reasons.
First of all, the author of the reading declares that the edmonosaurus diet may be the main reason of migration. He added that they used plants for feeding, but in such cold temperature, plants did not survive. This argument challenged by the speaker. She is of the opinion that the North Slope was warmer enough during the summer by 24-hour sun shine in the peak of summer to grow plants. Therefore, edmonosaurus have enough food during the winter and vegetation will not be a good reason for migration.
Secondly, the writer points to skeletons that have been founded in the same site. The lecturer, however, rebuts this bb asserting that founding the fossils of the edmonosaurus does not support the claim that they migrated there, because they may be there for protection from predators. She established an example, in which she mentioned the Roosevelt - a kind of plant- which is living in the United State and never migrate.
Finally, it is mentioned in the reading section that Edmonosaurus had the capability to migrate in a long distance. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that may Edmonosaurus are capable to migrate very fast, but this measurement can be confirmed by adults. The baby neither were capable to migrate in great distance, nor could survive in cold weather of North Slope.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 310, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ay migrated during the winter to south. The lecturer challenges the statements made...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 292.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96917808219 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65820137481 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52397260274 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1395457221 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7333333333 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252030852423 0.272083759551 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883291616596 0.0996497079465 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508483443355 0.0662205650399 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159313538569 0.162205337803 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257339372326 0.0443174109184 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.