The reading states that edmontosaur survived the winter by migrating south to more hospitble regions and provides three reasons of support. The professor, on the other hand, explains that migration of edmontosaur is not convincing and refutes each of author's reasons.
To begin with, the article claims that the edmontosaur's diet supports their migration. However the professor refutes this point by stating that the edmontosaur did not have to migrate. She mentions the point that the climate of Alaska's North Slope was warmer those days than todays. She therefore says that there were a lot of plants in there to be used by them. Also she mentions that in the winter there were a lot of nutrients.
Moreover, the article states that edmontosaurs lived and migrated in herd because of thier skeletons which have been unearthed from the same site. The professor says that living in herd does not mean that they migrate. She mentions other reasons that animals live in herd such as protecting themselves from predators. Besides, the lecturer provides an example of Roselct elk which they lived in herd but they never migrate.
Finally, the reading states that edmonosaurs were physically capable of migrating long distances. The speaker again rebuts this point by saying that their offsprings could not migrate long distances. She says that adults were not physically capable of migrating long distances. On the other hand, she mentions that their parents could not leave thier juvaniles to live in their own.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 87, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ntosaurs diet supports their migration. However the professor refutes this point by sta...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 363, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... of plants in there to be used by them. Also she mentions that in the winter there w...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, however, moreover, so, therefore, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1268.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 246.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15447154472 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51365495512 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508130081301 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 375.3 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.4047613987 49.2860985944 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.5333333333 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332201342491 0.272083759551 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115938644541 0.0996497079465 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666259305436 0.0662205650399 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200554963123 0.162205337803 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244874992696 0.0443174109184 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.