TPO-3: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made reading passage.
Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rembrandt because of its style, and indeed the representation of the woman’s face is very much like that of portraits known to be by Rembrandt. But there are problems with the painting that suggest it could not be a work by Rembrandt. First, there is something inconsistent about the way the woman inthe portrait is dressed. She is wearing a white linen cap of a kind that only servants would wear-yet the coat she is wearing has a luxurious fur collar that no servant could afford. Rembrandt, who was known for his attention to the details of his subjects’ clothing, would not have been guilty of such an inconsistency. Second, Rembrandt was a master of painting light and shadow, but in this painting these elements do not fit together. The face appears to be illuminated by light reflected onto it from below. But below the face is the dark fur collar, which would absorb light rather than reflect it. So the face should appear partially in shadow-which is not how it appears. Rembrandt would never have made such an error. Finally, examination of the back of the painting reveals that it was painted on a panel made of several pieces of wood glued together. Although Rembrandt often painted on wood panels, no painting known to be by Rembrandt uses a panel glued together in this way from several pieces of wood. For these reasons the painting was removed from the official catalog of Rembrandt’s paintings in the 1930s.
The reading passage and lecture have conflicting opinions about whether or not the " portrait of an Elderly woman in a White Bonnet" painting was portrayed by Rembrandt. The article strongly postulates that there are issues which can't match with Rembrandt's styles. On the other hand, the listening adamantly delineates that thanks to the precise examination, it is proved this painting is one his fine arts.
First and foremost, according to the author of the excerpt, the first problem is with the woman's attire which represents classic fur collar and can't be obtained by the usual servants. Nonetheless, the lecture offsets these points by declaring that the dyes acquired from this landscape indicated that it was added after one hundred years Rembrandt depicted the original painting. Since these additional pigments intended to expand its value and appear more elegant than the previous one.
The professor in the lecture further asserts that if it is removed from those extra colours, the fur collar will easily illuminate that the woman face absorbs the shadow. As a result, it becomes very alike to Rembrandt's manoeuvres which have used in his other compositions. These claims refute the writer's implications that the portrait's key elements do not consistent with Rembrandt's great ability to portray light and shadow. Furthermore, he asserts that the woman's face doesn't appear in the right shadow because it mostly receives light than darkness.
The article lastly points out that this picture was painted on glued several pieces of wood, however, it doesn't meet with the painter's style because he always used wood panels. In fact, there are no bits of evidence of his painting has ever depicted on several glued piece of woods. The speaker in the listening counters these indications by insisting that regarding as the reasons above mentioned, it was appended by someone who wanted to increase its significance and appearance in a more fancy way. As a matter of fact, it is reported that a piece of wood of original painting is the same as the trees used by Rembrandt's other arts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 65, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...lecture have conflicting opinions about whether or not the ' portrait of an Elderly woman...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... postulates that there are issues which cant match with Rembrandts styles. On the ot...
^^^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...which represents classic fur collar and cant be obtained by the usual servants. None...
^^^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat it was added after one hundred years Rembrandt depicted the original painting...
^^
Line 5, column 474, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ermore, he asserts that the womans face doesnt appear in the right shadow because it m...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ued several pieces of wood, however, it doesnt meet with the painters style because he...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 399, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...egarding as the reasons above mentioned, it was appended by someone who wanted to...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, nonetheless, regarding, so, in fact, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 1373.03311258 129% => OK
No of words: 344.0 270.72406181 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13953488372 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60914887571 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 145.348785872 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561046511628 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 419.366225166 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9086576725 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.285714286 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06452816374 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0894165852584 0.272083759551 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0297716938438 0.0996497079465 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0241490414153 0.0662205650399 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0539833747621 0.162205337803 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0180202476046 0.0443174109184 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 63.6247240618 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.