TPO 30 Integrated Writing
According to the lecture, three reasons to suspect the story of burning mirror is proposed. In contrast, the opposes that these reasons are, indeed, unconvincing, presenting three opposite view to reject these reasons.
First of all, burning mirror is thought to be just a myth in the passage because the ancient Greeks were not technologically advanced enough to build such an achievement as the result of the tough requirement, parabolic curvature, of making such a thing. Notwithstanding, the lecturer holds an contradictory viewpoint that this mirror is not a single sheet but dozens of little sheets. That is to say, Ancient Greeks could utilize numerous sheets to constitute a single wide parabolic one.
Second, it is thought to be a truth that burning mirror is not plausible since it will take a long time to have ships burned. In this case, the object need to be constantly static, which rules out the possibility of burning mirror. Nonetheless, the professor disagrees with this saying. She presents that if the whole ship is made of wood, it will take a lot d time. The ship made of pitch, however, will be easily caught with fire. After that, the fire caught on pitches can spread to woods surrounding, which makes time much more shorter.
Third, it is believed that a burning mirror does not seem like an improvement on a weapon existing: flaming arrows because they two are available at the same distance away from their enemies. Whereas, the woman regards that it may not be believable, saying weapons of burning mirror is a surprising weapon over the flaming arrow. Flaming arrow has be very familiar among enemies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ng. Notwithstanding, the lecturer holds an contradictory viewpoint that this mirro...
^^
Line 5, column 487, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'wood'.
Suggestion: wood
...he fire caught on pitches can spread to woods surrounding, which makes time much more...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 528, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'shorter' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: shorter
...oods surrounding, which makes time much more shorter. Third, it is believed that a burnin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 349, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...er the flaming arrow. Flaming arrow has be very familiar among enemies.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, nonetheless, second, so, third, whereas, in contrast, first of all, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97818181818 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72132685187 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6317588611 49.2860985944 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7857142857 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425352175894 0.272083759551 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127563137621 0.0996497079465 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768691323355 0.0662205650399 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212006167049 0.162205337803 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651996291363 0.0443174109184 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.