TPO 32
The reading passage claims that during 1960 until 1980 Russian submarines patrolling in the Arctic Ocean and they heard a strange sound called quackers. In fact, the source of this sound is still undetectable, but there are several theories suggested the source of this sound. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and presents some evidence to refute them all.
First, the author points out that this sound may have caused by male and female orca whale deep in the ocean when they called each other for ritual courtship. In contrast, the lecturer brings up the idea that Orca whales live near the ocean in contrast to submarines, which are deep in the ocean. So, in this situation, hardly can submarine hear the sound.
Furthermore, the author embraces the idea that perhaps this sound created by giant squads that are intelligent and invertebrate animals live deep in the ocean when reached in close contact with submarines. Conversely, the professor underlines the idea that Russian submarines first detected the sound and reported it. But after years, the sound disappear entirely. So, if the sound was the sound of squads, it could not start and stop regularly because they are also living there.
Finally, as set forth by the author other foreign submarines might play a role when hearing this sound because there is a possibility that they did not register on sonar, which is able to detect the sound under water. On the contrary, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that source of sound tended to move around and changed direction quickly and submarines were not able to move quickly and changed their direction. Also, there were no technologies to build such submarines to move faster.
Having scrutinized all the suggestions, a logical conclusion that can be drawn is that there is much evidence having been ignored by the author while the presence of which could strengthen the author's claim.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ich could strengthen the authors claim.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, then, while, in contrast, in fact, in contrast to, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 323.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01547987616 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45357941609 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551083591331 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8758189457 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.714285714 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06452816374 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.456251509131 0.272083759551 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158705869421 0.0996497079465 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762292070985 0.0662205650399 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241539150389 0.162205337803 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0911975527792 0.0443174109184 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.