tpo 32
The reading and the lecture both discuss "quackers" strange sounds that had have heard by Russain submarines police while guarding North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean between 1960-1980. The author suggests a few theories behind this phenomenon. On the other hand, the lecturer refutes each of the hypotheses provided in the reading passage and states that experts are still debating about the reasons for these odd sounds.
First and foremost, The lecturer argues the first point of the reading by saying that it is unlikely that female orch whale will produce quackers noises. According to the professor, the female orca swims close to the surface of the Ocean, while the submarines patrol vehicle moves in the deep ocean. For this reason, it is impossible that sound from surface water could reach the deep Ocean and particularly the isolated submarines. However, The reading only states that female orch omits noises to entice males for mating.
Furthermore, The listening contradicts the second point made in the reading passage by pointing out that giant squid is another doubtful reason for quackers. The professor explains that these odd noises have continued for 2 decades and disappeared after that. According to the lecture, the giant squid is still present in the area and not producing any noises. It is improbable that sounds appeared in two decades and stoped the following decades. On the contrary, the passage of the reading asserts that another theory to support the quacking phenomenon is the presence of giant squid in the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean. According to the author, those marine animals are smart enough and they can produce sounds to reach the submarines.
Finally, the speaker casts doubt on the third hypothesis of the reading passage by saying that the strange sounds were not coming from one of the foreign military submarines from outside Russia. According to the professor, the source of the bizarre sounds moves or changes directions so quickly. In addition, the professor explains that submarines theory does not hold water for the reason that these vehicles do not shift or alter direction in a fast manner. Although, the author posits that the origin of the odd noises was the foreign military submarine.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...;quackers' strange sounds that had have heard by Russain submarines police whil...
^^^^
Line 13, column 338, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'submarines'' or 'submarine's'?
Suggestion: submarines'; submarine's
...n addition, the professor explains that submarines theory does not hold water for the reas...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 443, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a fast manner" with adverb for "fast"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ehicles do not shift or alter direction in a fast manner. Although, the author posits that the o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 461, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ft or alter direction in a fast manner. Although, the author posits that the origin of t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, still, third, while, in addition, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1905.0 1373.03311258 139% => OK
No of words: 366.0 270.72406181 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20491803279 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55653184155 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 145.348785872 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 574.2 419.366225166 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1806474446 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.058823529 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5294117647 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.17647058824 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0776383076157 0.272083759551 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0269360121437 0.0996497079465 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0217371414501 0.0662205650399 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0507127842744 0.162205337803 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00868460549036 0.0443174109184 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 63.6247240618 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.