The reading and speaker discuss a phenomenon called Quacker sound in Russian submarines patrolling in the North and Arctic Ocean from different perspectives. The author of the reading gives three reasons to explain his idea. However, the speaker casts doubt on the claims made in the article. He says that none of those reasons that the article has mentioned are convincing.
First of all, the author of the reading points out that the Quacker sound comes from the courtship of orca whales. This point is challenged by the speaker. He restates the fact that the orca whales live near the surface of the ocean. Meanwhile, the sound was detected from the deep of the ocean.
Secondly, the author of the reading contends that huge squids cause the quacker sound. The speaker rebuts this argument by saying that strange sound that the article has stated that occurred since 1960 to 1980 and never happened again. In fact, the giant squids continue living in the ocean until now.
Finally, the author of the reading states that the Quacker sound could be the sound from some military technology to patrol areas. The speaker, on the other hand, opposes this point by saying that the Quacker sound moves around rapidly and its locations changed suddenly. He puts forth the idea that until now no one can have any idea to invent the sound that as fast as the quacker sound.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, in fact, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1135.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 236.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8093220339 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.18536877548 2.5805825403 85% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53813559322 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 419.366225166 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.885944608 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0714285714 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8571428571 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243823057361 0.272083759551 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886139362931 0.0996497079465 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686284232458 0.0662205650399 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15514548159 0.162205337803 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230207050869 0.0443174109184 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 53.8541721854 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.