TPO 33
In this set of material, the articule discusses three main theories to support the reasons why the carved stone ball were used as some purposes in the historic time, on the other hand the lecture casts doubt on the information which is presented in the reading section and believes that presented reasons are not convincing enough.
First of all, the reading section makes point that enstint people might used the carved stone balls for hunnting because they have holes regarding to this purpose. In contrast the constructor claims that hand huntting stuffs such as axes would have been cracked or broken down because of use in the passage of time, however their surface are wholesome. In fact, she elaborated by saying that their surface which are without any damage indicats that they were not used as hunnting.
Second, the professor disagrees with the idea that carved stone balls were used as the first system of weights. In fact, she cites the results of survey to highlight that they were not producted of uniform material, since every material has different density and their density is not uniform, they would not be used as weight and mesurement system. Especially, she explains what is their material and clarify her claims.
Finally, although the passage demonstrates that the carved ston balls were used as social purposes, the speaker posits that it is not convincing because some of these stuff have intricated and purplexed design, while other ones are too simple to have any application in the rutine life. In addition, she adds that in the past time every one especially high-ranking people were burried with all of their possossions, whereas any stuff has not found in the temples or graves. Since she strongly believes that the stone balls did not use as social purposes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In this set of material, the articule di...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d reasons are not convincing enough. First of all, the reading section makes ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...ave holes regarding to this purpose. In contrast the constructor claims that hand huntti...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that they were not used as hunnting. Second, the professor disagrees with the...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eir material and clarify her claims. Finally, although the passage demonstrat...
^^^^
Line 7, column 326, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...life. In addition, she adds that in the past time every one especially high-ranking peopl...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast, in fact, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 300.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00333333333 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39346099938 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523333333333 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 2.5761589404 311% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.8345281651 49.2860985944 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.1 110.228320801 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 21.698381199 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.3 7.06452816374 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387386370294 0.272083759551 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155371704807 0.0996497079465 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846359624541 0.0662205650399 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235095561736 0.162205337803 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260406994618 0.0443174109184 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.3589403974 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 53.8541721854 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.7273730684 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.