Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Without any shadow of a doubt, joyfulness and satisfaction are the most prominent trends and needs which are embedded in the people's spirit. Should people realize the significance of this issue on their life span, they will ponder over this question whether recently by galloping rate of changing the world, people feel less happy and joyful rather than past time. A plethora of people are inclined towards this conviction that altering the world's environment decreases the level of people's satisfaction sense, while others take a radically different perspective and believe that people feel happier than before. I do find the idea of the later group more in accordance with than of mine. To support my stance, in the course of this essay, I will aptly substantiate my viewpoints.
The first and the utmost exquisite point which coming to the mind to prove my standpoint is concerned with the issue that hardly can anyone deny that recently by developing the world and emerging the state-of-the-art facilities, new generation's people have more chance to access the entertainment. I mean, nowadays people can easily access to the recreational centers, parks, variety of games, name but not less. On the other hand, developing the modern technology, provides the opportunity that majority of people can enjoy the joyful time. For example, imagine the past time that there was not any coffee, any cinema or even any library; in this situation, is it logically acceptable to expect that people would be glad and receive pleasure? Obviously, the answer to this question in itself highlights the positive role of technology in our new generation's life fulfillment.
Another reason which deserves to say some words here is that changing the world provides the varieties of occupations for the people, which they can take one or some of them. This diversity in the working place makes them more motivated. Since, needs to occupation is one of the striking goal of individual's life, they can feel more satisfaction by having adequate income to get rid of their needs and their family's demand. In addition, if people have the job which are more interested in them or the one which are more accordance in their major, they do not feel boring during the life span. Thus, this event would be inspired them to enjoy their life and whatever happens to them.
In brief, by contemplating all aforementioned reason, one soon realizes this fact that altering the worlds in these days, not only refresh the people but also pave the way to have more delighted time. Since, I strongly subscribe to the idea that it is witnessed more joyfulness in the community rather than before time, the benefits of this measure outweigh to its disadvantage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 355, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
... feel less happy and joyful rather than past time. A plethora of people are inclined towa...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 442, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...wards this conviction that altering the worlds environment decreases the level of peop...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 568, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...e joyful time. For example, imagine the past time that there was not any coffee, any cine...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, thus, while, for example, i mean, in addition, in brief, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2281.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 453.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0353200883 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7120820224 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518763796909 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 719.1 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1667586605 48.9658058833 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.176470588 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6470588235 20.6045352989 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196706990649 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639815227694 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496907944032 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122151824674 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068101982363 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.