tpo31
In this set of material, the reading section explains some reasons to reject that line evidence on skelton of fossil dinosaur is the clue for feather, while the listening section casts doubt about the information presented in the passages and gives several reasons to prove that this evidence is the result of feather structures.
First of all, the article says that the lines in the fossil of dinosaurs are not clue of living structure in the animals. In the contrary, the professor states that these lines are the evidence of decomposition of feather in the passage of time. In fact, She believes that other fossils have been discovered which buried do not show up any evidence of line in other fossils, the volcanic ashes are clearly able to distinguish from fossil evidence. Thus, these make the strong that these lines are the result of decomposition of feather.
In addition, the professor disagrees with the idea that these lines not only are not the trace of feather but also are the clue of frills. She points out that there are huge different between chemical of feather and frills. She highlights that feather contains a kind of protein, on the other hand, frill dose not, and in the analysis of the lines composition there are trace of that protein. Hence, in light of these arguments, it is clear the lines are the evidence of feather.
Finally, although the passage asserts that these lines are located in the near of backbone and tail, the professor subscribes to the viewpoint that dinosaurs had colorful feather to attract the predators; recently, the results of analogy which conducted to them, identify that these lines were colorful, like orange and white. The results of these studies strongly support the theory that these lines were feather in the animal.
.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 343, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lines'' or 'line's'?
Suggestion: lines'; line's
...ll dose not, and in the analysis of the lines composition there are trace of that pro...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 407, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'feathered'.
Suggestion: feathered
...upport the theory that these lines were feather in the animal. .
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 430, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...these lines were feather in the animal. .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, if, so, thus, while, in addition, in fact, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 30.3222958057 171% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 301.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95681063123 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46174182225 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485049833887 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.9 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.8914363774 49.2860985944 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.636363636 110.228320801 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3636363636 21.698381199 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6363636364 7.06452816374 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296732010636 0.272083759551 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128290385171 0.0996497079465 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533930191426 0.0662205650399 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187399753252 0.162205337803 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513761533188 0.0443174109184 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.3589403974 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.7273730684 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.2008830022 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.