TPO 33 task 1
The reading states that there are some theories about the purpose of carved stone balls and provides three reasons for support. However, the professor states that none of the article's reasons are convincing and she refutes each of them.
First, the article states that carved stone balls were weapons. The lecture refutes this point by explaining that none of the signs that stone balls might be used as weapons were found on the carved stone balls. there must be cracked stones or stones that broken apart into pieces but all of these stones are well preserved in good shapes and there is no damage.
Second, the author asserts that carved stone balls were used as part of a system of weights and measures. The professor counters this by telling us that although carved stone balls shapes were similar the measures were different. and she mentions that same ball of feather and rock aren't equal in weight.
Third, the reading claims that carved stone balls served a social purpose as opposed to the practical one. In opposition, the professor states that it is very unlikely that these balls were for a social aim because the signs are too simple and if this was true it must be found in some graves that people were buried with their possessions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...s were found on the carved stone balls. there must be cracked stones or stones that b...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...re similar the measures were different. and she mentions that same ball of feather ...
^^^
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...ions that same ball of feather and rock arent equal in weight. Third, the reading ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, third, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 217.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79723502304 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.10282713702 2.5805825403 81% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52534562212 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 419.366225166 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0071105493 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.1 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.474916612646 0.272083759551 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.228469009041 0.0996497079465 229% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111392747061 0.0662205650399 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.30655099138 0.162205337803 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683175820209 0.0443174109184 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.