TPO-33 - Integrated Writing Task
The reading states that there are some theories about the purpose of carved stone balls and provides three reasons for support. However, the professor states that none of the article's reasons are convincing and she refutes each of them.
First, the article states that carved stone balls were weapons. The lecture refutes this point by explaining that none of the signs that stone balls might be used as weapons were found on the carved stone balls. there must be cracked stones or stones that broken apart into pieces but all of these stones are well preserved in good shapes and there is no damage.
Second, the author asserts that carved stone balls were used as part of a system of weights and measures. The professor counters this by telling us that although carved stone balls shapes were similar the measures were different. and she mentions that same ball of feather and rock aren't equal in weight.
Third, the reading claims that carved stone balls served a social purpose as opposed to the practical one. In opposition, the professor states that it is very unlikely that these balls were for a social aim because the signs are too simple and if this was true it must be found in some graves that people were buried with their possessions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...s were found on the carved stone balls. there must be cracked stones or stones that b...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stones that broken apart into pecies but all of these stones are well preserved i...
^^
Line 5, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arved stone balls were used as part of a system of weights and measures. The prof...
^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ounters this by telling us that although carved stone balls shapes were similar ...
^^
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that although carved stone balls shapes were similar but the measurs was differe...
^^
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
... similar but the measurs was different. and she mentions that same ball of feather ...
^^^
Line 5, column 288, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...ions that same ball of feather and rock arent equal in weight. Third, the reading ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...ial purpose as opposed to practical one.In opposition the professor states that it...
^^
Line 7, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...must be found in some graves that people were buried with their possesions.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, third, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1038.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 216.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80555555556 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.07440473555 2.5805825403 80% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527777777778 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 419.366225166 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.9607304601 49.2860985944 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.333333333 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.473301321801 0.272083759551 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.231222854529 0.0996497079465 232% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110774215006 0.0662205650399 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304140321311 0.162205337803 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692786780475 0.0443174109184 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 53.8541721854 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.