TPO 34
In this set of materials, both the lecturer and reading passage discuss the sea cows which are animals that would live in Siberia. The text presents three theories about the extinction of sea cows; However, the professor refutes all these theories and mentions the main cause of their extinction is still unknown.
Firstly, the professor articulates that sea cows are massive animals, they are about 9 meters long and weigh up to 10 tones. So, if the indigineous people would hunt them, they could feed on them for several months. Therefore, we can overlook their influence in the extinction of the sea cows. On the other hand, the article contends that the sea cows were a good source of food for the native people and it is possible that they overhunted the sea cows.
Moreover, the lecturer avers that if the number of kelps had been decreased, it must have some impacts on the other species in the ecosystem; For example the nuber of the whales should have been declined but it did not observed. Conversly, the text asserts that the sea cows population may have been affected by the ecosystem disturbances such as kelp reduction.
Finally, the professor declares that when the European fur traders came to the Siberia, the population of the sea cows had been fallen already. As a result, it is improbable that the European traders were had a pivotal role in the extiction of the sea cows and there must be another major factor which reslulted in the dying out of sea cows. On the contrary, the reading passage alleges that it is recorded that the fur traders caught the last sea cow in 1768 and as a result, they are responsible for the extiction of the sea cows.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 220, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'observe'
Suggestion: observe
...hould have been declined but it did not observed. Conversly, the text asserts that the s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 271, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cows'' or 'cow's'?
Suggestion: cows'; cow's
...onversly, the text asserts that the sea cows population may have been affected by th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, for example, such as, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 294.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73469387755 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45618978284 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510204081633 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 418.5 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.0645657009 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.545454545 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7272727273 21.698381199 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.0909090909 7.06452816374 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.528164686838 0.272083759551 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202330174032 0.0996497079465 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731004789538 0.0662205650399 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.300843530154 0.162205337803 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317301204907 0.0443174109184 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.