TPO 36 integrated writing
The text and also the lecture are about an environmental subject. The passage states about the hail production and its disadvantages when fall. Because of the greate force it destroys plants. scientists have found a solution for decreasing the hail fall. The passafe explains evidents that confirm the validness of this solution but the woman in the lecture disagrees about the theories.
The woman says that maybe this sollution is true just in lab condition and it is not feasible in reality. She also states that obtaining the same result in the agricultyre field is not obvious. So she thinks it is not a good reason. Also, the woman states that there is an other danger for using this method and it is increasing the droughtness.
Also, the woman in the talk says that decreasing the hail in conuntries of asia is not a strong evidence that this method decreases the hail in agricultural field of United States. Because the pollution in countries in somehow helps to cloud seeding and it is because of the particles of pollution.But in unpolluted area maybe this solution is not practical.
The second documant in the text compares two different years and declare that because of this method the amount of hail damage decreases, but the talk disagrees. Based on the talk maybe this decrease is just because of the variation of the wheather. So, in a nutshell, the lucture disagrees with all of these evidenys and refuts them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...uction and its disadvantages when fall. Because of the greate force it destroys plants....
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Scientists
...of the greate force it destroys plants. scientists have found a solution for decreasing th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 270, Rule ID: AN_OTHER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'another'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: another
...n. Also, the woman states that there is an other danger for using this method and it is ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
...s because of the particles of pollution.But in unpolluted area maybe this solution ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1189.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85306122449 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65944600645 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489795918367 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 367.2 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4602551243 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.9285714286 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 7.06452816374 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.