TPO 37
The reading passage and the lecture are both about TED method which is a escapping path for turtle. While the reading passage states that there are several reasons that show this strategy are not work the lecture contradicts these claims and provide evidence to the contrary.
First, the reading passage argues that turtle rarly cath by the nets and by using the TED method, many shrimps escap through the turtle path and it is not economical solution. Conversely, the professor brings up the idea that the turtle's population are small in number and if 1000 boat in USA accidentaly cauth the 1000 turtl in every year it become a big problem.
Second, the author holds the view that there are several strategy that can be used instead TED. For example, establish controling rules to limit the time that shrimp boat keep their net underwater. In contrast, the professor makes it clear that it is a good method in theory and it is not easy to monitoring the time limitation.
Furthermore, according to the passage the TED is not effective for big species and they cannot pass through the TED path. However, the professor underlines the fact that by modifying the TED, it can easily become useful for large one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ture are both about TED method which is a escapping path for turtle. While the re...
^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'turtles'' or 'turtle's'?
Suggestion: turtles'; turtle's
...e professor brings up the idea that the turtles population are small in number and if 1...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: small
...he idea that the turtles population are small in number and if 1000 boat in USA accidentaly cau...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'boat' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'boats'.
Suggestion: boats
...ulation are small in number and if 1000 boat in USA accidentaly cauth the 1000 turtl...
^^^^
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'becomes'?
Suggestion: becomes
...y cauth the 1000 turtl in every year it become a big problem. Second, the author ho...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 50, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun strategy seems to be countable; consider using: 'several strategies'.
Suggestion: several strategies
...he author holds the view that there are several strategy that can be used instead TED. For examp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'monitor'?
Suggestion: monitor
... method in theory and it is not easy to monitoring the time limitation. Furthermore, ac...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, while, for example, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 1373.03311258 74% => OK
No of words: 209.0 270.72406181 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83253588517 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40962182278 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564593301435 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 419.366225166 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5942976818 49.2860985944 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.222222222 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.77777777778 7.06452816374 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.