TPO 37- One of the threats to endangered sea turtle species is the use of nets by commercial shrimp-fishing boats. When turtles get accidentally caught in the nets, they cannot rise to the surface of the ocean to breathe, and they die. Some people suggest that this problem can be solved through an invention called a turtle excluder device (TED) that is incorporated into the nets. A TED provides a passage through which the turtles can escape. However, TEDs have been criticized for several reasons.
The reading and lecture are both about used of turtle excluder device (TED). The article states that TED device can help turtle from escaping the nets used by shrimp fishing boats. However, the lecturer casts doubts about the claims made in the article, saying that TED device protect the endangered turtle population and it is a vital part in every shrimp boat.
First of all, the author of the points out that shrimp farmers rarely caught turtle on their net. The article states that only one turtle a month is attached to their net, however, by using this method many shrimps escape in the net and it cost shrimpers a lot of money than saving one turtle. Conversely, the point is challenged by the lecturer. She says that it is true that shrimp fishers rarely catch turtle in their net, but thousand of shrimp boats in the Southern coast of United States are deployed to the sea and they trapped thousand of turtle in their net. Furthermore, she argues that it will become a big problem because some of the turtle belongs to endangered species type. In addition, the impact of TED in the individual shrimp farmers are less harmful than the whole population of the turtle because their population will become extinct.
Secondly, the author contends that there are other ways to protect sea turtle and that are more effective than TED. The article establishes that shrimpers must limit the time catching shrimp in order for the turtles caught to be released. On the contrary, the lecturer rebuts this argument. She suggests that it is a good thing to implement time limit in catching shrimp for the turtle have time to be brought in the air but it is only theory. Moreover, he elaborates on this by mentioning that it is impossible to reinforce due to government patrol boats cannot oversee the whole process of fishing shrimp. Also, the use of TED device is easy to implement it just need to be attached to the fishing vessel and checked by government official before sailing.
Finally, the author states that the device is not appropriate for large endangered species. The article denotes that larger species cannot pass through the net even if it has TED standards. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that the TED device can be easily be modified to accommodate large species. She puts forth the idea that if large TED are created then there ere no longer a problem with a larger turtle escaping the net.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...s rarely catch turtle in their net, but thousand of shrimp boats in the Southern coast o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 536, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...re deployed to the sea and they trapped thousand of turtle in their net. Furthermore, sh...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 635, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...at it will become a big problem because some of the turtle belongs to endangered species ty...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, in addition, first of all, it is true, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 22.412803532 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 30.3222958057 171% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2000.0 1373.03311258 146% => OK
No of words: 421.0 270.72406181 156% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75059382423 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.04702891845 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35076404448 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 145.348785872 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456057007126 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 616.5 419.366225166 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9158030417 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.263157895 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1578947368 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26315789474 7.06452816374 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264153029181 0.272083759551 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084319307558 0.0996497079465 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566449882417 0.0662205650399 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158188062326 0.162205337803 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604147163412 0.0443174109184 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.