TPO-39
The reading passage and the lecturer talking about the massive extinction of more than half of all living species according to many theories. But the professor claimed that assessment due to these theories may could happened long time ago before the extinction. He cast a doubt about this theories because of numerous reasons.
Firstly, according to the first theory disscused in the allegation of the script that the sea level were fluctuating occurred that impact most of the living species. For instance, the shallow and costal ocean species by getting destroyed. In contrast to the narrator who revealed that fluctuate happened definitely but was gradually changed according to the eco-system adaptation changes. Moreover, it should happened suddenly to lead to this massive extinction.
Second, according to another theory poses in the essay that the climate changes led to global cooling. Especially at the end of Triassic period when volcanic activity marked. The by product from the volcanos was huge amount of the sulfur dioxide and that affect the living of some species. The lecturer controvert this concept because he believes that the sulfur dioxide cleared out by binding to water and becoming rain.
Third, about the last theory the essay claimed that the Asteroid phenomena affect this species to live by making hug hall and block-out the sun light. Additionally, that impact species by ending with death and starvation for most of them. The aerator oppose that, he claimed that there was not any Asteroid at that time because Asteroid crashed with the earth many years before the extinction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'happen'
Suggestion: happen
...essment due to these theories may could happened long time ago before the extinction. He...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 285, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e the extinction. He cast a doubt about this theories because of numerous reasons. ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 304, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'controverts'.
Suggestion: controverts
...he living of some species. The lecturer controvert this concept because he believes that t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 252, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'opposes'.
Suggestion: opposes
...tarvation for most of them. The aerator oppose that, he claimed that there was not any...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, may, moreover, second, so, third, for instance, in contrast, talking about, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 258.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31395348837 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60412335461 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565891472868 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8126912115 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9285714286 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.