TPO 39
In this set of materials, the reading passage discusses that some possible explanation for a mass-extinction that occurred at the end of the Triassic period about 200 million years ago. While in the listening the professor casts doubt o what is presented in the text and believes that none of these theories are the good explanation of this mass-extinction.
First of all, in the text, it is clearly mentioned that the sea level decline is at the end of the Triassic period could be cased this mass-extinction. However, the professor claims that the sea level fluctuation could not be the actual reason for this happen. Because coastal down take place in several million years and this happens could create mass-extinction just if the decrease in the sea level occurred in a short time.
In addition, the professor disagrees with this idea that the rise in the amount of SO2 in volcanic activities could create massive climate cooling. She says that it is true that the SO2 can cause the cooling effect, but this cooling effect is not long enough to have the massive influence on climate temperature and led to mass-extinction. Because the SO2 combined with water in the atmosphere and rise down to the ground by Acidic rains.
Finally, in the text, it is stated that an asteroid strike at the end of the Triassic period affected the Earth climate by producing debris and blocking the sunlight. The professor subscribes that it is true that an asteroid impact can create this kind of effect but evidence of asteroid strike back to the 12 million years before this mass-extinction. And it cannot explain this extinction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lion years ago. While, in thb elistening the professor casts doubt o what is pres...
^^
Line 2, column 121, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'case'
Suggestion: case
...at the end of the Triassic period could cased this mass-extintion. However, the profe...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eate this kind of effect but evidence of asteroid strike back to the 12 million y...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, so, while, in addition, kind of, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86764705882 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74992135779 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 394.2 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5605401844 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.363636364 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27272727273 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 53.8541721854 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.