TPO 3
Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made reading passage.
painting which is ascribed to Rembrandt.
The reading and the listening materials have a debate on a painting which is ascribed to Rembrandt. The writer puts forward 3 main reasons that is refuted by following speaker.
First, the writer suggests that there is a mismatched point in dressing style of the woman in the picture which claims the painting is not drawn by Rembrandt. Wearing a peasant hat with a fur collar is a conflict that shows this painting is not belong to Rembrandt. The speaker views this issue from an opposite angle. According to him,the analysis of the fur collar paint declares that it is added to painting after 100 years of that first painting which meanes some one may wanted to increase it's value. As a result, the painting belongs to Rembrandt.
The second point that offered by writer is that the face of the woman is brighter as if, a source of light illuminates it from below but existing of collar should prevent from this phenomenon. Knowing the skill of Rembrandt does not allow us to deduce this fault is made by a famous painter. On contrary, the speaker casts doubt on this proposition by saying that the individual whom added the fur collar to painting is responsible to this constancy. The real painting had not that collar and bright face is sensible for the woman.
Last, the writer opposes that known Rembrandt's work are painted on wood panel and existing some pieces of wood glued together in this painting manifests that it is not belong to the Rembrandt. On the other hand, the speaker asserts that adding some pieces of wood is due to increasing the value of that master piece by an other person, and the original work is done on a single piece of wood.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'belonged'.
Suggestion: belonged
...onflict that shows this painting is not belong to Rembrandt. The speaker views this is...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...from an opposite angle. According to him,the analysis of the fur collar paint declar...
^^^^
Line 3, column 464, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...ars of that first painting which meanes some one may wanted to increase its value. As a ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...man is brighter as if, a source of light illuminates it from below but existing o...
^^^
Line 7, column 169, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'belonged'.
Suggestion: belonged
... this painting manifests that it is not belong to the Rembrandt. On the other hand, th...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 320, Rule ID: AN_OTHER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'another'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: another
...asing the value of that master piece by an other person, and the original work is done o...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, so, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1375.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66101694915 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43418156135 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494915254237 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.0 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2070324484 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.769230769 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 7.06452816374 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180808318337 0.272083759551 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731834542886 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586789542635 0.0662205650399 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112346248522 0.162205337803 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394009941432 0.0443174109184 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.