TPO 4
In this set of material, the author and the lecturer disagree on the merit of whether dinosaurs were endothermal animals. The reading passage states that those dinosaurs were probably endothermal creature, and they differ from regular reptiles. Furthermore, the passage suggests that the fossils of polar dinosaurs, the leg position which enhanced their fast running movement, and the Haversian canals in their fossils bones are solid evidence for their endothermal characteristics. In contrary, the professor challenges those evidence. He shows three reasons proving that those three reading arguments are; in fact, skeptical. Following are brief explanations of his perspective.
First of all, the writer asserts that the finding of bone fossils of dinosaurs in the polar area is substantial evidence to support that those animals were endothermal. Since animals at the polar are should be enothermal to maintain their internal body temperature above their real cold surrounding environment. However, the listening passage casts doubt that evidence, he claims that the presence of the fossils in the polar area does not necessary indicate they were endothermic. Because, the polar region was at that time warmer than today, and most of the current arctic animal species were not living in that climate, they might also, migrated or Harbinited at the harsh weather.
Second, the article claims that the leg position of the dinosaurs in their fossils shows it was helpful for them to run and move so fast. That locomotion activity of their body is similar those endothermic animals. Nevertheless, the professor refutes this point also. In the lecture, the lecture believes that this leg was necessary to support the huge body weight of that dinosaurs. Furthermore, the large leg was not essential for running or movement; it was for supporting their large body mass.
Last but not the least, the reading passage thinks that the presence of the Haversian canals in their fossils was another strong proof that they were endothermal animals because all endothermic animals' bone structure have that canal to grow faster. Whereas, the professor rebuffs this argument by stating that with evidence of those fossils sintenists studied those dinosaur's bones and discovered that the rings of than bone canal have several growths and nongrowth period among their life cycles. Which explains that those animals should not be endothermic because they stop growing at few times of the year may be because of the cold weather. While those endothermal animal's Haversian canal need to grow rapidly to support that kind of species.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Since animals at the polar are should be enothermal
Since animals at the polar area should be enothermal
is similar those endothermic animals
is similar to those endothermic animals
Sentence: Whereas, the professor rebuffs this argument by stating that with evidence of those fossils sintenists studied those dinosaur's bones and discovered that the rings of than bone canal have several growths and nongrowth period among their life cycles.
Description: The token of is not usually followed by a preposition
Suggestion: Refer to of and than
Sentence: Whereas, the professor rebuffs this argument by stating that with evidence of those fossils sintenists studied those dinosaur's bones and discovered that the rings of than bone canal have several growths and nongrowth period among their life cycles.
Error: nongrowth Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: sintenists Suggestion: intents
flaws:
No. of Words: 413 250
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 26 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 19 12
No. of Words: 413 250
No. of Characters: 2160 1200
No. of Different Words: 192 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.508 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.23 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.55 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 158 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 136 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 78 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 49 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.737 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.062 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.632 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.317 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.499 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.086 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 169, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rt that those animals were endothermal. Since animals at the polar are should be enot...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...eless, the professor refutes this point also. In the lecture, the lecture believes t...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for supporting their large body mass. Last but not the least, the reading pass...
^^
Line 4, column 647, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ear may be because of the cold weather. While those endothermal animals Haversian can...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'second', 'so', 'whereas', 'while', 'as for', 'in fact', 'kind of', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.260485651214 0.261695866417 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.134657836645 0.158904122519 85% => OK
Adjectives: 0.110375275938 0.0723426182421 153% => OK
Adverbs: 0.037527593819 0.0435111971325 86% => OK
Pronouns: 0.046357615894 0.0277247811725 167% => OK
Prepositions: 0.14348785872 0.128828473217 111% => OK
Participles: 0.0220750551876 0.0370669169778 60% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.64628639769 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0154525386313 0.0208969081088 74% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.123620309051 0.128158765124 96% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00883002207506 0.0158828679856 56% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00441501103753 0.0114777025283 38% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2615.0 1645.83664459 159% => OK
No of words: 413.0 271.125827815 152% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.33171912833 6.08160592843 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.04852973271 111% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.387409200969 0.374372842146 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.336561743341 0.287516216867 117% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.208232445521 0.187439937562 111% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.138014527845 0.113142543107 122% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64628639769 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 145.348785872 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484261501211 0.539623497131 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 52.9897193758 53.8517498576 98% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0529801325 138% => OK
Sentence length: 22.9444444444 21.7502111507 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.1930400496 49.3711431718 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.277777778 132.220823453 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9444444444 21.7502111507 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.888888888889 0.878197800319 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.39072847682 118% => OK
Readability: 56.6006187786 50.5018328374 112% => OK
Elegance: 1.94949494949 1.90840788429 102% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.114664707558 0.142949733639 80% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0648678048815 0.0787303798458 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.544157331987 0.631733273073 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.172789528959 0.139662658121 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.508171079317 0.414875509568 122% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0500249000569 0.0530846634433 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.26048565121 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 3.49668874172 229% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 10.2958057395 146% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.