The reading and the lecture are both contradicting with each other, in terms of the possibility of life on Venus. The author of the article states that it would not be possible to maintain human life on the Venus planet. However, the lecturer casts doubt about the claim mentioned in the article and refutes all the theories presented in the article. He says that the ideas are logical and practically possible to apply.
First of all, according to the reading, almost everything including humans and their spacecraft would be crushed due to the high atmospheric pressure at Venus surface. On the contrary, the speaker negates the argument presented in the passage. Furthermore, he discusses that the pressure is almost the same as the earth at the 50 kilometers high up above the surface of the Venus. He added that there would be no danger for humans and spacecraft at this level.
Secondly, the author posits that it is not possible to acquire water and air at the Venus planet, and it is an impractical way to supply air and water from the earth. Although the lecturer refutes this by asserting that chemicals such as sulfuric acids and carbon dioxide can produce oxygen and water at the station above the Venus surface.
Finally, it is mentioned in the article that humans can not produce enough electricity to power machines due to lack of sunlight reaches the planet's surface. On the other hand, the speaker believes that it is possible to produce sunlight from solar power cells which are established at the station above the surface. That solar cells would form the electricity by absorbing the direct sunlight from the above and reflected light from below at the planet surface. Hence, it is possible to maintain human life on the Venus surface.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, such as, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 300.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51106661711 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 464.4 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9175394233 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.785714286 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06452816374 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.464322951988 0.272083759551 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16080334928 0.0996497079465 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.09317374821 0.0662205650399 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272496974409 0.162205337803 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666086455958 0.0443174109184 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.